There are echoes of trade unionism in what Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders are asking for in the Voice to Parliament.
The upcoming referendum for a Voice to Parliament has come about after Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples held an extensive series of 13 regional dialogues that culminated in 250 representatives developing the Uluru Statement from the Heart in 2017.
Thomas Mayo, one of the Uluru Statement’s signatories and Assistant National Secretary of the Maritime Union of Australia, compared the consensus work in the dialogues by First Nations people from across the country and at Uluru, to union delegates working together.
“When you have a voice, you make greater progress. When you don’t have a voice, you’re easily exploited and ignored,” Mayo told the NSWNMA Annual Conference.
“So, we decided, looking at the history, when Indigenous people have had a voice, we made great progress. And when it’s taken away, the gap widens in life expectancy and all those other measures that we have failed to close.”
Throughout Australian history, groups such as the Australian Aboriginal Progressive Association in the 1920s and the Australian Aborigines’ League in the 1930s made progress for Indigenous people, “but what is in common is that they were all silenced”, said Mayo, a Kaurareg Aboriginal and Kalkalgal, Erubamle Torres Strait Islander.
Later governments formed Indigenous bodies that were constantly dissolved and replaced by new organisations: the Whitlam government established the National Aboriginal Consultative Committee, which was then abolished by Malcolm Fraser, who formed the National Aboriginal Conference (NAC), which in turn was replaced by Bob Hawke with the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission.
“Howard came in and got rid of that one, and that’s when we saw the gap widening,” Mayo said. “We couldn’t ignore those lessons from the past. Our voice is always taken away. So, we must enshrine it in the Constitution to see that it can consistently improve policies, programs and laws that affect our lives.”
Past government approaches have failed
Speaking alongside Mayo at the conference was Kerry O’Brien, journalist and former adviser to Gough Whitlam. With Mayo, he is co-author of the bestselling The Voice to Parliament Handbook.
O’Brien said the failures of past government approaches to Indigenous communities have been the result of “fly-in fly-out bureaucrats” who “would drop in, like cargo cultists from the sky”.
“They would have their pens, and they’d write copious notes. And they’d ask very learned questions, and they’d nod a lot. And they might even make some promises, and then they’d go away, in many cases, never to be heard from again, or when the policy outcome came back, it had nothing to do with the advice that was given to them.”
In contrast, O’Brien said, establishing a Voice will involve Indigenous representatives from around the country who will consult with their communities about policy that affects them and take their views to Canberra. Their advice would go to the relevant departments and Ministers to be considered by the cabinet.
But the Voice won’t have the power to “dictate to the Parliament or government”, O’Brien added. The Voice’s power will come from “the strength and the quality and the integrity of their arguments. But they will also have the moral and political authority that will be vested in them, by us with this referendum”.
O’Brien said referendums don’t happen often, but we shouldn’t “build a kind of mystique” around the Constitution as an unchangeable document.
The Constitution “has immense significance to us as a nation because it is the rulebook by which our democracy is framed through legislation in Parliament”, he said.
O’Brien pointed out that if the proposition is approved, future parliaments will have the power to legislate how the Voice is assembled and details such as the number of delegates and how often it meets.
There is much is at stake with this vote, Thomas Mayo says.
“If we can’t take this important proposal forward, it will be devastating. We won’t be closing the gap because nothing else has worked.
“The whole world will look at us and wonder what a backward country we are.”